Indian Journal of Public Health

ORIGINAL ARTICLE
Year
: 2016  |  Volume : 60  |  Issue : 2  |  Page : 99--106

Evaluation of quality of multivariable logistic regression in Indian medical journals using multilevel modeling approach


Rajeev Kumar1, Abhaya Indrayan2, Pragti Chhabra3 
1 Biostatistician, Department of Biostatistics and Medical Informatics, University College of Medical Sciences, New Delhi, India
2 Ex-Head of the Department and Professor, Department of Biostatistics and Medical Informatics, University College of Medical Sciences, New Delhi, India
3 Director Professor, Department of Community Medicine, University College of Medical Sciences, New Delhi, India

Correspondence Address:
Rajeev Kumar
Department of Biostatistics and Medical Informatics, University College of Medical Sciences, Room No. 401, Dilshad Garden, New Delhi - 110 095
India

Background: Availability of user-friendly statistical software has increased the application of multivariable logistic regression (MLR) in the medical journal many fold. The reporting quality in terms of checking assumptions, model building strategies, proper coding, and report format need proper care and attention to communicate correct and reliable model results. Objective: The objective of this article is to evaluate the quality of MLR article based on 10-point well establish criteria and to study the factors that may influence the quality. Methods: Study included PubMed indexed Indian medical journals as on March 2010 and published at least ten original articles that applied MLR during 10 years was included in the study. Multilevel modeling was applied to assess the role of journal and article attributes on MLR quality. Results: Twelve out of 39 Indian PubMed indexed journals fulfilled the inclusion criterion. Of a total 5599 original articles in these journals, 262 (4.68%) applied MLR in their study. Conformity of linear gradient assumption for continuous covariate was the least fulfilled criterion. One-third of the MLR articles involved statistician or epidemiologist as co-author, and almost same number of MLR articles«SQ» first author was from outside India. The trend of 10-point criteria remained consistent although the number of MLR articles increased over the period. The average quality score was 3.78 (95% confidence interval: 2.97-4.60) out of a possible 10. Larger sample size, involvement of statistician as co-author, non-Indian as the first author, and use of SAS/STATA software increased the quality of MLR articles. Conclusions: The quality of MLR articles in Indian medical journals is lagging behind as compared to the quality of MLR articles published from the United States and Europe medical journals. Joint effort of editors, reviewers, and authors are required to improve the quality of MLR in Indian journals so that the reader gets the correct results.


How to cite this article:
Kumar R, Indrayan A, Chhabra P. Evaluation of quality of multivariable logistic regression in Indian medical journals using multilevel modeling approach.Indian J Public Health 2016;60:99-106


How to cite this URL:
Kumar R, Indrayan A, Chhabra P. Evaluation of quality of multivariable logistic regression in Indian medical journals using multilevel modeling approach. Indian J Public Health [serial online] 2016 [cited 2021 Apr 20 ];60:99-106
Available from: https://www.ijph.in/article.asp?issn=0019-557X;year=2016;volume=60;issue=2;spage=99;epage=106;aulast=Kumar;type=0