|BRIEF RESEARCH ARTICLE
|Year : 2021 | Volume
| Issue : 5 | Page : 55-58
Outbreak investigation of foodborne illness among political rally attendees, Cuddalore, Tamil Nadu, India
Amol Annasaheb Patil1, Anoop Velayudhan1, GK Durairaj2, Pradeep Khasnobis3, Samir V Sodha4, Working Group*5
1 India Epidemic Intelligence Service Officer, National Centre for Disease Control, Delhi, India
2 State Epidemiologist, Department of Public Health and Preventive Medicine, Government of Tamil Nadu, Chennai, Tamil Nadu, India
3 Joint Director, Integrated Disease Surveillance Programme, National Centre for Disease Control, Ministry of Health and Family Welfare Government of India, New Delhi, India
4 Resident Advisor, Epidemic Intelligence Service Programme, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, India
|Date of Submission||19-Aug-2020|
|Date of Decision||06-Nov-2020|
|Date of Acceptance||16-Dec-2020|
|Date of Web Publication||29-Jan-2021|
Amol Annasaheb Patil
213, Kadambari Apartment, Rohini Sector 09, Delhi - 110 085
Source of Support: None, Conflict of Interest: None
| Abstract|| |
In July 2015, we investigated a foodborne illness outbreak in Sithalikuppam and Verupachi villages, Cuddalore district, Tamil Nadu, among the political rally attendees to determine the risk factors for illness. We conducted a retrospective cohort study, calculated risk ratio for the food exposures, and cultured stool specimens. Of 55 rally attendees, we identified 36 (65%) case patients; 32 (89%) had diarrhea and 20 (56%) had vomiting. Median incubation period was 14 h. Eighty-nine percent (32/36) of those who ate lemon rice at dinner had illness compared to 21% (4/19) of those who did not (RR 4.2). Of the six nonattendees who ate leftovers on July 25, all ate only lemon rice and became ill. Stool cultures were negative for Salmonella, Shigella, and Vibrio species. Lemon rice was probably contaminated with enterotoxins such as from Bacillus cereus. Our findings highlighted need for community food safety education and importance of thorough outbreak investigations.
Keywords: Acute diarrheal disease, Bacillus cereus, bacteria, foodborne outbreak, India
|How to cite this article:|
Patil AA, Velayudhan A, Durairaj G K, Khasnobis P, Sodha SV, Working Group*. Outbreak investigation of foodborne illness among political rally attendees, Cuddalore, Tamil Nadu, India. Indian J Public Health 2021;65, Suppl S1:55-8
|How to cite this URL:|
Patil AA, Velayudhan A, Durairaj G K, Khasnobis P, Sodha SV, Working Group*. Outbreak investigation of foodborne illness among political rally attendees, Cuddalore, Tamil Nadu, India. Indian J Public Health [serial online] 2021 [cited 2021 Mar 5];65, Suppl S1:55-8. Available from: https://www.ijph.in/text.asp?2021/65/5/55/308317
Aakash Shrivastava, Joint Director, Epidemiology Division,
National Centre for Disease Control, Ministry of Health and Family Welfare,
Government of India, New Delhi; Padmini Srikantiah, Senior Medical
Epidemiologist, Kayla Laserson, Country Director; Mayank Dwivedi, Senior Lab
Advisor, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention India, Atlanta, Georgia, USA
The World Health Organization estimates that worldwide as many as 600 million persons, or almost 1 in 10, suffer foodborne illness each year. In India, despite reports of only a few foodborne illness outbreaks, usually those with high rates of illness or in urban areas, foodborne illness, and acute diarrheal disease constituted nearly half of all outbreaks reported to the Integrated Disease Surveillance Programme during 2011–2015. In India, analytic epidemiologic investigations of foodborne illness outbreaks remain uncommon, and outbreak etiologies are infrequently identified. In 2013, the National Centre for Disease Control in Delhi, in collaboration with the US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, began a pilot project in two districts of Tamil Nadu state in southern India to enhance detection and response to diarrheal illness outbreaks. The project focused on strengthening district-level epidemiologic and laboratory capacity to detect and systematically investigate foodborne illness outbreaks. One pilot district was Cuddalore (2011 census: population ~2.6 million), located approximately 175 km south of Chennai.
On July 25 and 26, 2015, 36 persons from adjacent Sithalikuppam and Verupachi villages in Cuddalore sought care for diarrhea or vomiting at the primary health center. All ill persons reported attending a political rally 250 km away at Tiruchirappalli on July 24. On July 27, we initiated an investigation to describe the epidemiology and identify risk factors associated with the cases.
We defined a case as diarrhea (≥3 loose stools in 24 h) or vomiting between July 24 and 26, 2015, among residents of Sithalikuppam or Verupachi villages. We conducted active surveillance through house-to-house visits in both villages to identify additional cases in the area. We inquired about clinical symptoms and timing of illness. Hypothesis-generating interviews indicated that all rally attendees ate food that was specially prepared for the journey to the rally. This food was lemon rice, curd (yogurt) rice, lemon pickle, and packaged drinking water. Thus, the structured questionnaire focused on ingestion of these items.
We also conducted a retrospective cohort study to identify risk factors. We defined the cohort as persons from Sithalikuppam and Verupachi villages who attended the political rally on July 24. Exposed were defined as persons who attended political rally on July 24 and ate specific food items. Unexposed were defined as persons who attended the political rally on July 24 and did not eat specific food items. We interviewed rally attendees using a structured questionnaire to collect information about sociodemographic characteristics, symptoms, and food items eaten on July 24. We used Open Epi 3.03 software (Emory University, Atlanta, Georgia, USA) to calculate attack rates (ARs) among exposed and unexposed persons. We conducted bivariate analysis to determine whether an association existed between foods eaten by rally attendees and development of illness and considered P ≤ 0.05 as statistically significant.
Stool specimens collected from 42 case patients were sent to Cuddalore district public health laboratory for microbiological culture. This laboratory can conduct culture and isolation for 3 enteric pathogens: Shigella, Salmonella, and Vibrio cholerae. Toxin-based testing was not available. We interviewed the cook about recent illness and preparation of implicated food items. We also evaluated the storage and delivery practices used for the food prepared for the rally.
The investigation was a public health response to an outbreak as part of the India Epidemic Intelligence Service Program, undertaken with the purpose to identify the source of spread for immediate control of outbreak and intended for benefit of the community at large. The investigation did not involve any human laboratory sample collection for research purposes and there were no invasive investigations or medical interventions/experiments. All Government of India ethical principles and guidelines were adopted during the outbreak response: the investigation was aimed at achieving public good (beneficence) and collective welfare (solidarity); no harm was done to any individual (nonmaleficence); fair, honest, and transparent (accountability and transparency); and participants' data were de-identified before analysis (confidentiality).
| Results|| |
From primary health center records and house-to-house searches, we identified 42 case patients from Sithalikuppam (40 [95%]) and Verupachi (2 [5%]) villages; 24 (57%) were male, and the median age of all case patients was 50 years (range: 22–80 years). Of the 42 case patients, 38 (90%) had diarrhea and 23 (55%) had vomiting. All patients recovered completely within 24 h; no deaths occurred. Cases were uniformly distributed by location, and we detected no geographic clustering. The overall AR for Sithalikuppam and Verupachi villages was 5% (42/855). The ARs were 65% (36/55) for those who attended the rally and 0.8% (6/800) for those who did not attended the rally.
The rally attendees left Cuddalore district at 9 a.m. on July 24 to travel to Tiruchirappalli district. All attendees ate only food prepared for the trip; lunch was at 3:30 pm. and dinner at 9 pm. Thirty-six (65%) of 55 attendees reported becoming ill between 5 a. m. and 6 p. m. on July 25 [Figure 1].
|Figure 1: Epidemic curve of 42 foodborne illness cases in Sithalikuppam and Verupachi villages, Cuddalore, Tamil Nadu, India, between 24 and 26 July 2015.|
Click here to view
None of the food items eaten by rally attendees at lunch on July 24 was associated with illness [Table 1]. Analysis of the four dinner items revealed that only eating lemon rice was significantly associated with illness (AR among exposed and unexposed was 89% and 21%, respectively, with relative risk 4.2 (1.8–10.2) [Table 1]. The median incubation period from lemon rice ingestion at dinner and illness onset for rally attendees was 14 h (range: 9–20 h).
|Table 1: Comparison of lunch and dinner items eaten to foodborne illness among political rally attendees in Cuddalore, Tamil Nadu, India, on July 24, 2015 (n=55)|
Click here to view
Six additional case patients who did not attend the rally reported eating leftover lemon rice, the only remaining food item from the rally, at 9 a. m. on July 25 [Figure 1]. All six persons reported vomiting between 8 p. m. on July 25 and 1 a. m. on July 26. The median incubation period from lemon rice ingestion to illness onset was 12 h (range: 10–15 h).
All ten (24%) stool specimens collected from the 42 identified case patients were negative for Shigella, Salmonella, and V. cholera by culture and microscopy.
The cook reported no diarrhea, vomiting, or other gastrointestinal illness symptoms during the month before the outbreak. Lemon rice was prepared on the ground in an open space from 3 a.m. to 5 a.m. on July 24. The cooked rice was spread over a dry cotton cloth (placed directly on the earthen ground) for approximately 1 h to cool. The rice was then placed in a vessel and mixed with lentils and spices that had been tempered in oil and peeled lemon. The preparation was then packed in four stainless steel containers and placed near the bus's engine during the 6–7-h journey. The highest ambient recorded temperature on the rally day was 40°C (104°F).
We investigated a foodborne outbreak of diarrhea and vomiting among political rally attendees, as well as nonattendees who ate leftovers from the rally, in Cuddalore district, Tamil Nadu. The rapid response and detailed epidemiologic investigation identified illness associated with ingestion of lemon rice.
Even without laboratory confirmation, the epidemiologic, clinical, and environmental findings suggest the most likely etiologic agent was Bacillus cereus. Outbreaks of diarrheal B. cereus typically have a clinical presentation of mostly diarrhea and some vomiting after an incubation period of 8–16 h. Consistent with these characteristics, this outbreak had a similar incubation period and a predominance of diarrhea (90%) with some vomiting (55%). Sources of B. cereus include the soil, where end ospores are abundant. Many outbreaks of B. cereus have been associated with ingestion of boiled or fried rice kept at a high ambient temperature for a prolonged time, which results in bacterial growth and production of heat-resistant enterotoxins. In this outbreak, the lemon rice was not refrigerated after possible contamination with spores during preparation on an earthen surface. The B. cereus spores probably germinated as the rice cooled, and transport and storage at high ambient temperatures promoted bacterial growth with resultant enterotoxin production.
Without laboratory confirmation of B. cereus toxin, we cannot rule out other possible etiologies. The Staphylococcal aureus toxin was another possible etiology in this outbreak given the large proportion of vomiting among case patients, but S. aureus outbreaks generally have shorter incubation periods (<6 h). Clostridium perfringens is another possible etiologic agent. However, its incubation period is usually at least 24 h, and although clinical presentation is also predominantly diarrhea, vomiting rarely occurs. In addition, the source of infection is usually of animal origin.
Our findings are subject to several limitations. First, recall bias is possible because the cook and case patients were not interviewed until 7 days after the outbreak. There was no toxin testing available. Finally, at the time of the investigation, food samples were no longer available for testing. Nevertheless, the strength of the epidemiologic findings provides sufficient data to conclude an association between ingestion of contaminated lemon rice and development of illness.
Foodborne illness is an underestimated public health problem in India. Robust foodborne disease surveillance combined with high-quality outbreak investigations is needed to better clarify the extent, sources, and risk factors associated with foodborne illnesses. We recommended continued expansion of district-level capacity for laboratory-based surveillance of diarrheal disease pathogens to help detect outbreaks and identify their etiologic agents.
We thank S. Balasubramanian, State Surveillance Officer, K. R. Jawaharlal, Deputy Director, Department of Public Health and Preventive Medicine, Government of Tamil Nadu, India Cuddalore district Integrated Disease Surveillance Programme Unit and health staff, Government of Tamil Nadu, India, for facilitating the outbreak investigation; Dr. A.C. Dhariwal from the National Vector Borne Disease Control Programme, Ministry of Health and Family Welfare, Government of India, New Delhi, India; Dr. Sanjay Chaturvedi from University College of Medical Sciences (Delhi), India; and Dr. Lata Kapoor, Dr Anil Kumar, S. Venkatesh, National Centre for Disease Control, Ministry of Health and Family Welfare, Government of India, New Delhi, India for providing technical assistance for outbreak investigation and manuscript writing; Dr. Ekta Saroha, and Dr. Rajesh Yadav CDC India, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia, USA, for providing technical assistant and scientific review.
Financial support and sponsorship
This public health activity was conducted by the India Epidemic Intelligence Service (EIS) officers at the request of the Government of Arunachal Pradesh state. The National Centre for Disease Control receives funding support for the India EIS Program through cooperative agreement No. NU2GGH001904GH10-1001 from the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Center for Global Health, and Division of Global Health Protection. The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.
Conflicts of interest
There are no conflicts of interest.
| References|| |
Havelaar AH, Kirk MD, Torgerson PR, Gibb HJ, Hald T, Lake RJ, et al
. World Health Organization global estimates and regional comparisons of the burden of foodborne disease in 2010. PLoS Med 2015;12:e1001923.
Dean AG, Sullivan KM, Soe MM. OpenEpi: Open Source Epidemiologic Statistics for Public Health, Version. https://www.OpenEpi.com
. [Last accessed on 2013 Apr 06; Last cited on 2020 Apr 07].
Ehling-Schulz M, Lereclus D, Koehler TM. The Bacillus cereus
Group: Bacillus Species
with Pathogenic Potential. Microbiol Spectr 2019;7:10.1128/microbiolspec.GPP3-0032-2018. doi: 10.1128/microbiolspec.GPP3-0032-2018.
Gilbert RJ, Stringer MF, Peace TC. The survival and growth of Bacillus cereus
in boiled and fried rice in relation to outbreaks of food poisoning. J Hyg (Lond) 1974;73:433-44.
Tong SY, Davis JS, Eichenberger E, Holland TL, Fowler VG Jr. Staphylococcus aureus
infections: Epidemiology, pathophysiology, clinical manifestations, and management. Clin Microbiol Rev 2015;28:603-61.
Kiu R, Hall LJ. An update on the human and animal enteric pathogen Clostridium perfringens. Emerg Microbes Infect 2018;7:141.