Users Online: 1842 Home Print this page Email this page Small font sizeDefault font sizeIncrease font size
 

 

Home About us Editorial board Search Ahead of print Current issue Archives Submit article Instructions Subscribe Contacts Login 
     

 Table of Contents  
LETTER TO THE EDITOR
Year : 2016  |  Volume : 60  |  Issue : 3  |  Page : 238  

Students' perception of quality of medical education in a medical college in West Bengal, India


Professor, Department of Information Technology, Management Development Institute, Gurgaon, Haryana, India

Date of Web Publication24-Aug-2016

Correspondence Address:
Dr. Netra Pal Singh
Department of Information Technology, Management Development Institute, Mehrauli Road, Sukhrali, Gurgaon - 122 007, Haryana
India
Login to access the Email id

Source of Support: None, Conflict of Interest: None


DOI: 10.4103/0019-557X.189034

Rights and Permissions

How to cite this article:
Singh NP. Students' perception of quality of medical education in a medical college in West Bengal, India. Indian J Public Health 2016;60:238

How to cite this URL:
Singh NP. Students' perception of quality of medical education in a medical college in West Bengal, India. Indian J Public Health [serial online] 2016 [cited 2019 Nov 19];60:238. Available from: http://www.ijph.in/text.asp?2016/60/3/238/189034

Sir,

I read an article entitled, "Students' perception of quality of medical education in a Medical College in West Bengal, India" with high interest written by Mukhopadhyay. [1] I value it a very interesting study for college administration. The author identified the gap between expectation and perception of students with respect to five dimensions of service quality of medical education in West Bengal, India. The author used modified instrument (SERVQUAL) for the study. It is a very interesting study in line with the similar studies conducted in other countries.

I request some clarifications from the author. The sample of the study includes teachers and students, and questionnaire of the study includes some questions/statements for teachers. It would have been better that sample size includes only students as per the objectives of the study. Pilot sample consists of 100 students and sample size of the study is 199 (179 students + 20 teachers). Usually, pilot sample is much smaller than sample of the study. It could be 10% of total sample size.

Further to it, there is no mention about sampling framework. Research is performed using well defined and already researched and identified dimensions. It means that it is a fit case of confirmatory factor analysis. Wilcoxon-signed rank test is used for smaller samples of ordinal data, being nonparametric test for non-normal data; however, in this case, the sample size is 199 and no mention about non-normality of data. Data were collected on few demographics (gender, year of study), but results and interpretations are not based on these demographics. Table 1 and Table 2 in the original article [1] consist of values <0.1 which is contrary to the footnote of the table. Secondly, in factor analysis, highest magnitude of factor loadings is considered to identify component of a factor not its sign. Therefore, omitting the factor loading <0.1 with higher negative magnitude is not desirable. It would have been better to include at least mean score of all statements/questions before writing conclusions.

Financial support and sponsorship

Nil.

Conflicts of interest

There are no conflicts of interest.

 
   References Top

1.
Mukhopadhyay DK. Students' perception of quality of medical education in a medical college in West Bengal, India. Indian J Public Health 2016;60:4-9.  Back to cited text no. 1
[PUBMED]  Medknow Journal  




 

Top
 
 
  Search
 
    Similar in PUBMED
   Search Pubmed for
   Search in Google Scholar for
    Access Statistics
    Email Alert *
    Add to My List *
* Registration required (free)  

 
  In this article
    References

 Article Access Statistics
    Viewed502    
    Printed4    
    Emailed0    
    PDF Downloaded149    
    Comments [Add]    

Recommend this journal