Users Online: 569 Home Print this page Email this page Small font sizeDefault font sizeIncrease font size
 

 

Home About us Editorial board Search Ahead of print Current issue Archives Submit article Instructions Subscribe Contacts Login 
     
SPECIAL ARTICLE
Year : 2004  |  Volume : 48  |  Issue : 1  |  Page : 5-16

Monitoring the size of the leprosy problem: Which epidemiological indicators should we use?


Royal Tropical Institute (KIT), Leprosy Unit, Amsterdam, The Netherlands

Correspondence Address:
Wim H Van Brakel
Royal Tropical Institute (KIT), Leprosy Unit,KIT Leprosy Unit, Wibautstraat 137 J, 1097DN Amsterdam
The Netherlands
Login to access the Email id

Source of Support: None, Conflict of Interest: None


PMID: 15704720

Rights and PermissionsRights and Permissions

The purpose of the study was to discuss the interpretation of epidemiological trends in leprosy, using currently available indicators. A number of leprosy-endemic countries and regions were chosen for which epidemiological data have been published for a period of at least 15 years. Using these examples, relative merit of the registered prevalence rate, the case detection rate, the children proportion among new cases and proportion of new cases with grade 2 disability will examined for interpreting the leprosy situation in these countries. Considerable drop of the registered prevalence rates (PR) were evident in all endemic countries. However, this decline was due largely to shortening of treatment and 'cleaning' of leprosy registers and has not been reflected in the annual case detection rates (CDR), except in a few countries. The proportion of new cases with grade 2 impairment had decreased substantially, which indicates earlier case finding. However, the proportion of children among new cases did not change much in the past decade. It is indicate that transmission is still continuing. We reiterate the conclusion of the ILA Technical Forum that the (annual) case detection rate is the most appropriate indicator for monitoring of leprosy situation in a given country or area. Two additional indicators that helped to interpret the CDR were the proportion of new cases with grade 2 impairments, reflecting the delay between occurrence and diagnosis of the disease, and the proportion of children among new cases, which is used as a proxy indicator for recent transmission.


[PDF]*
Print this article     Email this article
 Next article
 Previous article
 Table of Contents

 Similar in PUBMED
   Search Pubmed for
   Search in Google Scholar for
 Related articles
 Citation Manager
 Access Statistics
 Reader Comments
 Email Alert *
 Add to My List *
 * Requires registration (Free)
 

 Article Access Statistics
    Viewed295    
    Printed20    
    Emailed0    
    PDF Downloaded171    
    Comments [Add]    
    Cited by others 4    

Recommend this journal